Features of Natural Moral Law & Dicuss Whether Its Strengths

EXAMINE THE KEY FEATURES OF born(p) MORAL justice & DICUSS WHETHER ITS STRENGTHS OUTWEIGH ITS WEAKNESSES essential Law has roots that subject back to Ancient Greece, and it was Aristotle who documentaryly created the approach. It was to a fault depicted in Sophocles looseness of the bowels Antigone, where the protagonist claims her right to bury her brother despite the King (Creon) gild that he be fed to dogs. Antigone, (the protagonist) proclaimed this because she believed that at that place was a high law than the Kings, particularly, Natural Law.However, it was not until the 13th Century until doubting Thomas Aquinas developed its key features, that it was actually more widely recognize as a moral theory. When we focus on the recipient of the natural law, that is, us human beings, the proposition of Aquinass natural law theory that comes to the heading is that the Natural law establishes the basic principles of applicatory rationality for human beings, and has this s patial relation by Nature. These are to be followed universally, as Cicero puts it it is one eternal and carved in stone law will be valid for all nations and all measure.According to Aquinas, all humans seek good and when we do wrong or evil, it is only because we are only seeking apparent goods and not real goods. So, we could ask ourselves, how does Aquinas define a real good? A real good is when the state good falls under the atomic number 23 uncreated precepts. These are self-preservation and preservation of innocents, educating children, living in society, reproducing and worshipping God. Aquinas also believed that we can use our rationality to know Natural Law.It is inherent inside our human nature, God reveals specific commands but these do not go against natural law but rather, further develop it. Aquinas said that a moral bearing is a life entirely followed accord to reason. Aquinas allowed for the Aristotelian insight that the particulars of the situation evermore master ones rules, so that one will always need the moral and dexterous virtues in order to act well. But he denies that this means that there are no principles of right conduct that hold everywhere and always and some even absolutely.On Aquinass view, killing of the innocent is always wrong, as is lying, adultery, sodomy, and profanation and that they are always wrong is a matter of natural law. Therefore, Natural law is absolute, but surely, we can ask ourselves, what about double issue? What if a dying mother had to give an abortion to preserve her life? For Aquinas, there are two key features of the natural law, features the acknowledgment of which structures his backchat of the natural law.The first is that, when we focus on Gods role as the conferrer of the natural law, the natural law is upright one aspect of bode providence and so the theory of natural law is from that perspective just one part among others of the theory of divine providence. The second is that, when we focus on the humans role as recipient of the natural law, the natural law constitutes the principles of practical rationality, those principles by which human action is to be judged as reasonable or unreasonable and so the theory of natural law is from that perspective the superior part of the theory of practical rationality.Whilst Natural law may be a particularly easy, universal theory that can apparently be followed by all people it has shortcomings. BEGAN FIRST WITH STOICS IN THE WEST THIS IS hotshot OF THE FIRST HYBRID THEORY humane think + predict COMMANDS THE thirteenth CENTURY WAS A GOLDEN AGE FOR CATHOLICISM, RULED BY THE conceit OF REVELATION/FAITH/PRIESTHOOD THOMAS AQUINAS REASONED THAT WE be make IN THE IMAGE OF GOD THAT HE GRANTED US REASONING AND THAT WE CAN USE THIS REASONING THAT LINKS WITH PHILOSOPHY WHICH OVERLAPS WITH FAITH/DIVINE COMMANDS. REASON IS 1+1=2.AQUINAS SAID WE CAN USE HUMAN REASON TO PROVE THE EXISTENCE OF GOD. DIVINE LAW THIS COMES FROM GOD . UNIVERSAL LAW = NATURAL LAW BROKEN DOWN INTO HUMAN LAWS. Ironically, all the primary precepts are about perpetuating the human race DOUBLE EFFECT STATES THAT IF IN ORDER TO GOOD YOU HAVE TO DO LESSER/UNINTENDED wicked ONE MAY PROCEED scarce IT HAS TO UNINTENTIONAL. NATURAL LAW DEFENDS THE simply WAR THEORY CAPITAL PUNISHMENT IS ALLOWED/JUSTICE WHAT ABOUT quirkiness? THEYRE VIOLATING PRINCIPLE NUMBER 2 PROCREATION BUT neither WOULD BIRTH CONTROL OR CELIBACY.JUSTICE (LEGALISTIC)/EQUALITY/REASON-BASED/CONCISE IT CAN retell YOU WHAT TO DO IN close ANY MORAL DILEMMA UNIVERSAL. IF thither IS A GOD, JUSTICE WILL BE AS undisputableD. THEREFORE, EVEN IF YOU SUFFER BY FOLLOWING NATURAL LAW, BALANCE WILL BE DEALT. GOD MAKES SURE THAT THE INNOCENT ARE VINDICATED AND GUILTY ARE PUNISHED. CONS NO GRACE, mercy OR FORGIVENESS ALLOWED. AN shopping centre FOR AN EYE, A TOOTH FOR A TOOTH. A spirit FOR A LIFE BECAUSE IT IS A REASON BASED THEORY, IT CAN BE RATIONALISED AND CAN BE SUBJECTIVE. BY USING DOUBLE EFFECT YOU COULD RATIONALISE roughly ANY BEHAVIOUR YOU WANT. BIRTH CONTROL IS A BAD THING. BUT WHAT ABOUT IN AFRICA, HIV/AIDS ETC. EFFECT YOUR self-importance PRESERVATION. PERSONAL OPINION OF NATURAL LAW IT CAN BE MASSAGED INTO JUSTIFYING ALMOST ANYTHING BY THINKING ABOUT IT. I LIKE AQUINAS I LIKE ITS SIMPLICITY BUT THE WORLD IS NOT THAT NEAT AND TIDY, THE RULES ARE TOO VAGUE. I DONT WANT TO LIVE IN A WORLD WHERE THERE ARE NO SECOND CHANCES. AN EYE FOR AN EYE WILL LEAVE THE WHOLE WORLD BLIND.