Men and Women in Society

Well obviously, workforce and women atomic number 18 resistent. In order of magnitude up to now men and women play very different agencys. Used to be, men were looked at as the dominant one in a relationship and society. straightway a day women ar becoming dominant in to a greater extent(prenominal) ways than one. For example, in the job world, organisation, relationships, freedom, and sex be clean more or less of the categories that women ask risen in, in society. More women ar in positions of index and authority. compensate though, because of the past, men and women will never be treated the same, in society nearly men and women are treated fairly ex go to. thither is picayune to no discrimination in the job field or the government against women in society. Men are unagitated usu every(prenominal)y looked at as a uplifteder class than women unless that is plainly because of the past reddents that be in possession of happened in society. The world is becomi ng an all- nigh equal place. The history of women in the American boil cart has been shaped by diverse cultural, levelheaded, demographic, and ethno-racial influences.Like men, women in preindustrial America contri only whened to their household and community economies through paid and unpaid labor, however the material rewards of their labor were limited by cultural beliefs, social practices, and laws that subordinated women to men. overleap by special legal arrangement, married women could not sign labor contracts, own property, or claim their own earnings. Some women did work for wages, but those who did, even unmarried women and widows, clustered in lower-paying occupations and earned lower wages than men.Initially, these conditions were reproduced, and even accentuated, as the industrial economy developed. As families became more strung-out on cash for survival, free women (as comfortably as free men) change magnitude their fellowship in the paid labor force. Especial ly numerous as seamstresses in the needle trades and in domestic work, women were also essential to the emerge factories. Other women worked as members of family production units (in shoemaking or retail shops, for example) and as homeworkers in textiles, shoes, or early(a) productspatterns of work that let off persist.Laws granting married women legal rights to their wages and to property became common only in the late ordinal coke. The growing identification of men as breadwinners and the rise of an urban mediate class (with its status-conscious emphasis on the lady of leisure) further streng thus the tendency to view women as secondary wage-earners, regardless of their actual contributions to family survival. From the late nineteenth cytosine onward, U. S. -born white women enjoyed steadily expanding access to nonagricultural and nonindustrial occupations. They progressively found jobs as office clerks and secretaries and in retailing.Benefiting from expanded educationa l opportunities, white, conservative women in the late nineteenth century get toed the professions in growing numbers, initially as teachers, librarians, social workers, and nurses, and later in a variety of passage paths, from firefighting and police work to the law, medicine, the ministry, higher education, and in the corporate world. Historically, patterns of participation in the paid labor force lay down varied dramatically by marital status as well as by ethnicity and nativity. Until the 1930s, most wage-earning women were unmarried.As late as 1960, only one-third of married women were gainfully employeda figure that obscures a common pattern of irregular yet continuing labor-force participation. Only in the late twentieth century did that pattern decisively shift. In 1997, 61. 3 part of married women were in the labor force (Boydston). Although only in the late twentieth century did most labor unions show an interest in organizing female workers, women in the paid labor force long constituted an aggressive force for reform. In the government of the U. S. women, such as Hilary Clinton, are only if as strong and knowledgeable as men.Women have run for president, in that respect has been a cleaning lady as secretary of state, as have many other women who have been incorporated into the government staff. Men have incessantly been mingled in the government. The obvious facts of this are all of the male presidents that have been in office, there has never been a female president, not to say that there never will be. at that place will be, one day, a women in office running the United States. In the 1995 World Conference on Women, 189 governments committed to ensure womens equal access to and full participation in power structures and decision-making. To fulfill this strategic objective, governments also pledged to prove the intention of sexual urge balance in governmental bodies and committees as well as in public administrative entities and in the judiciary. Six geezerhood later, not much has changed womens representation in politics body dismally low. (UNDP 2). Today women are only 13. 7 share of parliaments world-wide according to data collected by the Inter-Parliamentary Union, a mere 0. 6 percent increase annually. In the Asia Pacific, women are 14. 2 percent of home(a) parliaments (UNDP 1).At this rate, it will put in 75 long time before women attain equal representation in national governments. At the local level, the situation is no different women define up a small percentage of legislative councils and other local bodies in most countries in the world. Only Sweden, Denmark and Finland in Europe have reached a critical mass of 30 percent women in local governments, while South Africa and Trinidad and Tobago come close at 28 and 23 percent respectively. In the Asia Pacific, womens representation in local governments has ranged from a low two percent to a high 30 percent (e. . India, Bangladesh and New Zea land)(UNDP 2-3). Even though women are told that they are equal in the government, according to the facts, they really are not. There are the obvious difference near men and women and sex, but men and women have different characteristics when it comes to sex. It probably wont surprise you to learn that researchers have found that men tend to initiate sex more frequently than do women. Researchers have also found that men tend to be more finale oriented, to consider the act of sex, especially orgasm, to be what love making is all just about.Women, in contrast, tend to focus more on tenderness and the calibre of their emotional relationship. Keep in mind that generalizations about human behavior, although dependable in the abstract, do not apply to individuals. Most men and women evidently have different emphases on sexual intercourse and emotional relationships, but any event individual whitethorn vary from this tendency. A particular man, for example, whitethorn be more orient ed toward intimacy, a particular woman toward having sex. Generalizations, then, can rail to stereotypes that paint everyone with the same broad brushstroke, causing us to overlook individual differences.One of the ways our culture inhibits womens sexuality is through stereotypes. A sexually promiscuous man is often looked up to by his booster stations. He is seen as a success in sexual matters, a conqueror, a sexual victor. In contrast, a woman who has many sexual partners is not as probably to be viewed in the same way. Questions are likely to be raised about why she is like that. People may refer to her by negative terms, such as whore. Although this double true of stereotypes is easing, it persists. When it comes to staring(a)ity men and women typically re viewed different. Women expressed more positive feelings about their decision, and they were more apt to say they were proud or satisfied with their virginity. Men, in contrast, were more apt to say they felt embarrasse d or even guilty about their virginity. The reason for this difference in attitude about virginity is likely due to sexuality roles, to differences about what is expected of men and women. There appears to be a general idea that if a woman is a virgin, she is one by choice, but if a man is a virgin, he has problems of slightly sort.It seems that a woman can wait for the right person, or for marriage, but a man ought to be seeking sexand the more sex he has, the manlier he is. In short, being a virgin may challenge a mans masculinity, but not a womans femininity. In relationships between men and women some say that men and women can just be friends. They way men chose their friends is not just my the females own(prenominal)ity. A man choses his female friends by how attracted he is to them. Even if it is just a small attraction, its still there. A man isnt discharge to initiate friendship with someone he deems ugly, or unprepossessing.The same goes for women. So, in essence men and women cannot just be friends. There is always something more there to tempt either the man or the women, whether he/she is in another relationship or not, to have some kind of whether it be physical or emotional connection with that friend. When polled, 58% said yes , and 42% said no men and women cannot just be friends ( Friends). So really there are no certain(prenominal) answers to this question. Throughout history, womens rights have been the subject of much debate and controversy.The concept of a womans right can take a variety of forms including voting, reproductive control, equality in the workplace and service in the military. In most societies the womens movement has confront opposition and equality has been hard won. Equal rights campaigners have championed the movement with the goal of establishing fair and comparable treatment for women under law. Evidence dating from around 8500 B. C suggests that in Ancient Egyptian societys work was divided on gender lines with the women assuming agricultural duties and the men victorious on the role of hunter/gatherer (sampson).Progress has been made over the decades, but there is still debate over some aspects of womens rights and the extent to which they have effectively redressed the earlier imbalance. In a 2009 report published by the Department of Labor, it is state that on average women earn approximately 80 percent of the requital a man is paid for the same job. Whilst this is an improvement from 30 years before, when a woman earned 62 percent of a mans salary, it does still not represent full parity.Reproductive rights are also a contend issue with opinions divided on whether abortion should remain legal. In a 2009 poll by CBS news, 23 percent of respondents believed abortion should be immoral versus 34 percent fully supportive of abortion without constraint, and 40 percent in favor of keeping the practice legal but with stricter controls (Sampson). Even though women have rose in society the re is always that barrier that was created long ago restricting some peoples views of womens freedom and power in society. Men and women also tend to handle different situations differently.Perhaps if something breaks, the woman is more apt to be cool down about the situation when the man is more apt to have a complete melt down about the situation. When an argument happens and the man is damage he backs down, when a woman is wrong she back tracks her point and someways proves the man wrong, or so he thinks. When women are right they male parentt boast or rub it in so to speak. When men are right they are the first ones to say I told you so. Are women naturally more risk-averse or less inclined to enter a competitive situation? Or are they trained to be that way?Why women and men might have different preferences or risk attitudes has been discussed but not tested by economists. Broadly speaking, those differences may be due to nurture, nature, or some combination of the two. For instance, boys are pushed to take risks and act competitively when participating in sports, and girls are often advance to remain cautious. Thus, the choices made by men could be due to the nurturing received from parents or peers. Similarly, the disinclination of women to take risks or act competitively could be the result of parental or peer contract not to do so. Educational psychologists argue that the gendered aspect of individuals behaviour is brought into play by the gender of others with whom they interact, and that there may be more pressure for girls to maintain their gender identity in schools where boys are present than for boys when girls are present. In a coeducational environment, girls are more explicitly confronted with adolescent subculture (such as personal attractiveness to members of the opposite sex) than they are in a single-sex environment. This may lead them to conform to societys expectations of how girls should behave to avoid social rejection. ( Booth). If competitive behaviour or risk avoidance is viewed as being a part of female gender identity, while risk-seeking is a part of male gender identity, then a coeducational school environment might lead girls to make less competitive and risky choices than boys. It is hypothesized that hypothesized that woman and men may differ in their propensity to choose a risky outcome for some(prenominal) reasons innate references or because their innate preferences are modified by pressure to conform to gender-stereotypes. Single-sex environments are likely to modify students risk-taking preferences in economically substantial ways.Our specific conjectures were that girls from single-sex schools are less risk averse than girls from coed schools, and that girls in same-gender groups are less risk averse than girls in coed groups. It has been conjectured that girls in same-gender environments (single-sex schooling or same-gender experimental groups) are no less risk-averse than boys. Naturally it is assumed that women are less risky than boys this is because the women always feels like she has to be the protector and if she is taking risks she is not able to protect the ones taking risks.