Political Dynasty Essay

The Philippine organic law is a sociable lead which embodies the primeval patterns and policies, admiting to which the Filipino community be governed by the State. The fundamental rulers argon abstr characterization and as such they cover every formula of the life of the Filipino bulk while the fundamental policies cover particularised areas of application of those principles. The fundamental principles persist fixed and permanent, scarcely the policies built upon those principles finish be modified or repealed by legislation to suit the ask of the times.The title is product of my out of the box philosophizing about the edible of ingredient 1 and Section 26 taken together of expression II of our typography. I must say that philosophizing does not discern us my conclusions and/or thoughts are objurgate or wrong, true or false, tho it has certainly given me the basis upon which to present my meta-under place uprighting of Section 1 and Section 26 phrase II, Sect ion 1 says The Philippines is a egalitarian and republican state. Sovereignty resides in the people and all regimen dresser emanates from them. This is the most staple fiber principle of the Constitution, and it preserves to a natural law as formulated and accepted in the mind it furbish ups also to essential honor upon which other truths are based. Article II, Section 26 The State shall attempt equal access to opportunities for public servicing, and prohibit semipolitical dynasties as may be delimit by law. This is a insurance built upon the principle of Section 1, and it refers to a planned line of conduct in the lighting of which individual decisions on political dynasties are made and coordination is achieved.Moreover, political dynasties refer to the line of politicians of the same families. both coin has two inseparable reversal sides the head and the tail yet they complement each other as they are opposed to each other to constitute only unmatchable coin. S imilarly, the political issue on dynasty has two opposite yet completing sides (a) the principle of political dynasty of Section 1 and (b) the the policy of political dynasty of Section 26. Both Sections constitute one Article II. The policy of Section 26 names the specific area of application of the principle of Section 1 of the same Article II.The policy of Section 26 is built upon the basic principle of Section 1. Moreover, the fundamental principle of Section 1 remain fixed and permanent, simply policies of Section 3 can be are modified or repealed by legislation to suit the needs and demands of the times. The heap The Creators and Masters of Political Dynasties The phrase sovereignty resides in the people, and all government authority emanates from them clearly shows that the people are the habitat of the sovereignty.However, people come two distinct yet mutually complementary intends, namely, people as electorate which is the source of political indicator of take poli ticians and people as somatic nation which is the reason for be of elected politicians. These dual meanings of people in effect signify that the elected politicians are public servants of the people hence the people are their boss and master in our democratic and republican state, not the way around By virtue of their sovereign power, the people are superior to any and all existing political dynasties, whose reason for being is service to their masters, the people.On virtuous grounds, the people must be change to the reality that they are the boss of political dynasties, and therefore they have no reason to fear the, before, during, and after political elections. Centrality of Morality in the Constitution The centrality of goodity to our Constitution is evident in the preamble, in the imploration to Almighty god for aid to build a just and humane society and to pitch a Government that shall embody the Filipino ideals and aspirations and promote their common near under a regi me of truth, justice, freedom, love, equality, and peace.The rest of the Constitution revolves around these moral ideals and moral values. These are the moral foundations of the Social Ethics Society. There are socio-economic phenomena in many areas of the coun fork out where the life-style and the exercise of political power by political dynasties is betrayal of public trust, because it is not in accord with the following moral imperatives and criteria of right and wrong in public service Public office is a public trust.Public officers and employees must at all times accountable to the people, serve them with utmost responsibility, integrity, loyalty, and efficiency act with patriotism and justice, and lead modest life. (Article X on Accountability) Every elected politician in the public service is bound to hold by those mandates. Congress had devoteed anti-graft and anti- asperseion laws, e. g. RA No. 6713, also known as Code of Ethics for Government Officials and Employees, in the public service. However, it appears that many of our elected politicians pay only lip service to anti-Graft and Anti-Corruptions laws.For instance, there are far-flung phenomena of bribery and corruption in the public service, reportedly perpetuated by corrupt politician, many of whom are allegedly members of political dynasties. Centrality of Morality to Legality The Preamble provides the moral grounds and the foundation of respectable politics of several Articles of the Constitution. No statutory law is enforceable if it is unconstitutional and the Constitution cannot be obligate if it is immoral. The bottom line any enabling law on political dynasty is sanctionedly binding upon the Filipinos, only if it is constitutional and moral.A law that is moral is always constitutional, but a law that is constitutional is not needs moral. A Moral and Ethical Proposal I believe the policy of Section 26 which prohibits political dynasties as may be defined by law has two distinct opp osite sides, (1) the letter of the Constitution which is the legalistic side, and (2) the spirit of the Constitution which is the honourable side. The pro-political dynasty advocates and promoters behave in accord with legal politics.Their action is legal so long as there is no law defining and enabling the constitutional prohibition against political dynasties. Therefore, the anti-dynasty advocates and promoters should stand on moral and ethical grounds against political dynasties. It is my proposal on moral and ethical grounds that the anti-dynasty advocates should develop and promote the concept of political dynasty of the people based on the principle of Section 1 face-to-face the political dynasties of oligarchs based on the policy of Section 26 but built upon the principle of Section 1.When there is a conflict amidst a principle and its policy, the principle should prevail over its policy. Moral, Ethical, and Legal Practices in Politics Moral and ethical are similar in mea ning in that they both have to do with the difference between right and wrong. They are dissimilar in meaning in that ethical tends to refer to a code, system, theory, or standard of judging rightness or wrongness of moral behavior whereas moral tends to refer to more concrete choices and issues that charge strong feelings.In other words, moral refers to good and evil, while ethical refers to right and wrong. Because of the untruthful disclosure of his SALN per Code of Ethics, former SC forefront Justice Renato Corona was found ethically wanting for which he was impeached, patronage his superior legalistic knowledge of law Hence, we could say that what is moral is always ethical, but what is ethical is not necessarily moral. Hence, when an elected politician acts according to RA 6714, his behavior is ethical as well as legal what is ethical is always legal, but what is legal is not necessarily ethical.The avocation of Ethical Politics Our major problem in the pursuit of ethica l politics is the lack of political will on the part of the people as electorate. Let us awaken and educate their political consciousness, and endow their political will by making them conscious of their being the political dynasty that is superior over all existing political dynasties of oligarchs per mandate of Article II, Section 1 that the people are the habitat of sovereign power, but the exercise of such pwer is delegated and vested upon elected politicians.Assume that Congress would never pass the law enabling the policy against political dynasties let us thence resort to the principle of Section 1 in Article II. This principle does not require any enabling law because it is precisely the supreme basis of all enabling laws. This is the principle why the political candidates try to win the votes of the people during political campaigns. We have indeed laws prescribing the requirements of the policy to vote. The Social Ethics Society can start the movement to marginalize the political dynasties,, if not altogether eliminate them eventually from the political landscape of the Philippine.